Here We Go Again.

---

Global markets raced to new record highs on a largely uneventful week… Right. In a week that saw possibly the most highly anticipated US Presidential Election in generations and a US Federal Reserve rate cut, markets welcomed both events with open arms. While we had been writing for weeks that market volatility might pick up around the election given most political pundits expected the event to very close and likely contested. The pundits got it wrong as the clear-cut-victory of President Trump was a major de-risking event. Markets hate uncertainty and there was no uncertainty in the outcome of this election. The result, the biggest single-day-gain post election in market history.

While votes are still coming in, it is quite possible that President Trump will win both the popular vote and all seven swing states. Control of the House of Representatives, however, remains to be determined, but if all House races finalize at the current levels then Republicans would have a three-seat majority in the House. Full control of Congress is crucial to Republicans for passing tax policy and fiscal spending. President Trump’s victory, however, affords near unilateral control over tariff policy. It is also worth remembering that the coming Republican-controlled Senate will be responsible for confirming the Cabinet and regulators, which are also important levers and mechanisms for policy implementation, not the least of which will be a lower regulatory touch under the coming administration.

Source: Investment Management Trump 2.0

Apologies for writing yet another weekly comment on US politics. We promise to get back to our regular scheduled programming around inflation and interest rates next week. So, diving into the policy and market implications, the possibility of a Republican sweep entails significant implications for tax policy, as President Trump will strive to maintain all of the 2017 Tax Cut and Jobs Act (TCJA) tax changes, plus add additional cuts such as lowering the corporate tax rate to 15% for domestic manufacturers. It remains to be seen how such a stipulation would get implemented in practice, but the stated goal is to bring manufacturing jobs back to the U.S. On net, tax policy and fiscal spending should be stimulative for the economy.

Source: Investment Management Trump 2.0

This additional stimulus, however, is not a one-way street. Tax cuts and spending proposals could see the fiscal budget deficit – already projected to be 6.5% of GDP in 2025 – explode to 8% or greater. Between higher deficits, tariffs, and more economic stimulus, it is possible that long-term bond yields could continue to push higher even as the Federal Reserve lowered short-term interest rates. In the aftermath of the election results, the yield on the 10-year Treasury note rose from about 4.30% to 4.46%, which has pressured some interest-sensitive areas of the market such as housing and real estate stock. If the 10-year Treasury yield remains below or around 5%, we see little spill-over effects to the broader equity market, but a significant push to 5.5% or beyond would likely result in a downward repricing of equities. Of note, this is not the base case for BMO’s Economics Team.

Source: Investment Management Trump 2.0

Tariffs will surely play a key role under President Trump’s policy framework, in part because they generate revenue for the federal government to offset a portion of the tax cuts and spending initiatives. To President Trump, tariffs are also the tool to foster the return of manufacturing jobs to the United States. It is unclear, however, whether the tariff policy under a second Trump administration would simply begin and end with an across-the-board tariff of 10% or 20% (setting China aside, which would clearly be subject to much higher tariffs). On October 15, 2024, at the Economic Club of Chicago, former President Trump discussed tariffs at length as a means to “bring companies back to our country.” He elaborated that, “the only way you can do it is through the threat of tariffs . . . a lot higher than 10%.” The approach to tariffs under a Trump administration could range from a surprisingly benign mode of striking deals in order to bring jobs back to the U.S. to the opposite end of the spectrum where trade wars and drawn out tit-for-tat create economic disruptions.

Source: Investment Management Trump 2.0

Both infrastructure and financials are reacting positively to the election results. The coming Trump administration will be keen to cut regulation affecting these sectors and promote the build-out of the U.S. manufacturing base, electricity grid, and energy sector. We believe that President Trump will push for only limited changes to President Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), including in areas such as clean energy credits. The momentum in U.S. infrastructure comes from public spending, fiscal stimulus bills, private sector spending, AI spending, and international inflows and should continue to be an area of thriving investment.

Source: Investment Management Trump 2.0

In summary, under a Republican sweep, the scope for changes to taxation and fiscal spending is large. Tariff policy is likely to fit into the larger mix of initiatives, but President Trump’s approach could take different directions. While the inflation risk to tariffs is often cited and could moderate Fed rate cuts in 2025, we see this risk as relatively circumscribed. Under an optimistic scenario, tariff threats lead to deal making (remember, he is the greatest deal maker of all time) and some degree of jobs returning to the United States. The U.S. stock market welcomed a Trump victory in 2016 and is showing similar early enthusiasm. While we continue to believe the market environment is broadly positive for risk-taking, a second Trump administration entails a new set of considerations, higher octane, and a president prepared to grapple with economic forces. The one thing we know for certain, holiday dinner tables are going to be full of flustered conversations for the next 4 years…

Source: Investment Management Trump 2.0

 

The opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are those of the author as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice and may not reflect those of BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. ("BMO NBI"). Every effort has been made to ensure that the contents have been compiled or derived from sources believed to be reliable and contain information and opinions that are accurate and complete. Information may be available to BMO Nesbitt Burns or its affiliates that is not reflected herein. However, neither the author nor BMO NBI makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, in respect thereof, takes any responsibility for any errors or omissions which may be contained herein or accepts any liability whatsoever for any loss arising from any use of or reliance on this report or its contents. This report is not to be construed as an offer to sell or a solicitation for or an offer to buy any securities. BMO NBI, its affiliates and/or their respective officers, directors or employees may from time to time acquire, hold or sell securities mentioned herein as principal or agent. NBI will buy from or sell to customers securities of issuers mentioned herein on a principal basis. BMO NBI, its affiliates, officers, directors or employees may have a long or short position in the securities discussed herein, related securities or in options, futures or other derivative instruments based thereon. BMO NBI or its affiliates may act as financial advisor and/or underwriter for the issuers mentioned herein and may receive remuneration for same. A significant lending relationship may exist between Bank of Montreal, or its affiliates, and certain of the issuers mentioned herein. BMO NBI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of Montreal. Any U.S. person wishing to effect transactions in any security discussed herein should do so through BMO Nesbitt Burns Corp. Member-Canadian Investor Protection Fund.