Surcon Mahoney Wealth Management
Helping Canadians build financial clarity and long‑term confidence through thoughtful guidance and personalized wealth strategies.
Meet the Team
In the latest SPIVA Canada Year-End 2025 scorecard, 98.8% of Canadian equity funds and 97.1% of U.S. equity funds available to Canadian investors underperformed their benchmarks over the past 10 years. That is the core case for passive investing in one sentence: if almost nobody beats the market after costs, why build your plan around trying?
This article covers what passive index investing actually is, why it works, what you can buy in Canada, and where it fits (and doesn’t fit) inside a real financial plan.
Topic: Passive vs Active Investing Classification: For Client Reference
Most active fund managers lose to the index. SPIVA data shows that over 10 years, 98% of Canadian equity managers underperformed their benchmark -- and 97% of U.S. equity managers available to Canadians did the same.
Fees compound against you. A 1.75% MER (Management Expense Ratio) gap between a typical Canadian mutual fund and an index ETF can cost over $155,000 on a $100,000 portfolio over 25 years.
⚠ That's more than the original investment -- lost entirely to fees
Investor behavior matters as much as fund selection. Dalbar research shows average equity investors earned roughly 3.9 percentage points less per year than the S&P 500 over 30 years, mostly because of emotional timing decisions.
→ The best portfolio you can't stick with is worse than a good one you can
A portfolio is not a plan. Passive investing solves the investment question -- but tax strategy, retirement drawdown sequencing, and estate planning require a different kind of expertise.
→ Where you hold matters as much as what you hold
What Is Passive Index Investing?
Passive index investing means buying a fund that mirrors a market index. The S&P/TSX Composite, the S&P 500, a global equity index. You own a tiny slice of every company in that index, and your returns match the market’s returns, minus a small fee.
This is not a fund manager picking stocks. No one timing when to get in or out. The fund just holds what the index holds, rebalances when the index changes, and that’s it.
This is a strategy, not a product. You can implement it through ETFs, index mutual funds, or asset allocation funds. The common thread is the same: own the market, accept the market’s return, keep costs low.
Why Does Passive Investing Build Wealth Over Time?
Markets tend to grow over long periods. The S&P/TSX Composite has returned roughly 8.7% annualized over 30 years. The S&P 500 has returned about 10.3% over the same stretch. Those are total returns, dividends included.
Second, passive investing keeps more of that return in your account. According to IFIC, the average asset-weighted MER for long-term Canadian mutual funds was 1.47% in 2023, while the comparable ETF average was 0.32%. And if you buy a basic market tracker, fees can drop even lower: VCN was listed at 0.05% MER, XIC at 0.06%, and XSP at 0.09%.
Using those fee levels as a rough illustration, a $100,000 portfolio growing at 7% gross annually for 25 years ends up at about $536,000 with a 0.05% fee and about $384,000 with a 1.47% fee. That is a difference of roughly $152,000 created mostly by cost drag. Same investor. Same market. Different fee structure.
How Does Active Investing Compare to Passive?
Active investing is when a person or fund manager makes specific choices to try to outperform a benchmark. Picking individual stocks, overweighting sectors, timing entries and exits. It can also mean paying for an actively managed mutual fund where a portfolio manager makes those calls on your behalf.
The appeal is obvious. Beat the market, earn more. The problem is that the data consistently shows most managers don’t pull it off, especially after fees. And for individual investors, the results are even worse.
| | Passive Investing | Active Investing |
| Management style | Tracks an index automatically | Manager selects holdings |
| Typical MER | 0.03% - 0.25% | 1.50% - 2.10% |
| Goal | Match market returns | Beat the benchmark |
| Tax efficiency | Generally higher (less trading) | Generally lower (frequent trading) |
| Time commitment | Minimal (1-2 hours/quarter) | Significant (ongoing monitoring) |
| 10-year track record | Outperformed 98% of active Canadian equity managers (SPIVA) | 2% of managers beat the index |
When Does Active Management Still Make Sense?
There are situations where active decisions add genuine value. Tax-loss harvesting in a non-registered account. Managing a concentrated stock position after selling a business. Accessing private credit or real estate that doesn’t exist in any index. Building a custom bond ladder for retirement income.
The distinction worth making: those are planning decisions, not stock-picking decisions. A financial advisor can build your portfolio on a passive foundation and still add active value through tax optimization, account selection, and withdrawal sequencing.
A passive portfolio can still sit inside a very active financial plan. Tax-loss harvesting. Asset location. RRSP versus TFSA versus non-registered decisions. Withdrawal sequencing in retirement. Behavioural coaching during a crash. Vanguard’s research argues that this kind of work can matter a lot more than trying to pick the next winning manager.
What Are Your Passive Investment Options in Canada?
Canada’s ETF market is not small anymore. According to the CETFA Monthly Report for December 2025, Canada ended 2025 with 1,472 ETFs and $735.1 billion in ETF assets.
Index ETFs vs. Index Mutual Funds
Index ETFs are the more popular option now. MERs range from 0.03% for a plain Canadian equity tracker to about 0.25% for a global fund. They trade on the stock exchange like a regular stock, and most Canadian discount brokerages offer commission-free ETF purchases.
Index mutual funds charge a bit more, usually 0.30% to 0.70%. Their edge: you can set up automatic contributions in exact dollar amounts without worrying about share prices. For someone who wants to automate $500 a month and never think about it, they’re still a reasonable choice.
What Are Asset Allocation ETFs?
These are single-ticket portfolios. One fund that holds a diversified mix of Canadian, U.S., international equities, and bonds. You pick your risk tolerance (conservative, balanced, growth, all-equity), buy one ETF, and the fund automatically rebalances for you.
How Does Passive Investing Fit Into a Bigger Financial Plan?
Passive index funds solve the investment question. What should I own? How much should I pay? Those answers are straightforward. But a portfolio sitting inside the wrong account, drawn down in the wrong order, or disconnected from a tax strategy leaves real money on the table.
Where you hold your investments matters. U.S. equities in an RRSP avoid the 15% U.S. withholding tax on dividends under the Canada-U.S. tax treaty. Canadian dividend stocks are more efficient in a non-registered account because of the dividend tax credit. Bonds and interest-bearing holdings belong inside registered accounts where interest income gets sheltered. Same funds, different placement, meaningfully different after-tax outcome. Morningstar research suggests proper asset location adds 0.20% to 0.75% in after-tax returns per year, depending on your tax bracket and portfolio size.
Retirement drawdown is where it gets genuinely complex. The sequence in which you pull from your RRSP, TFSA, non-registered accounts, and when you start CPP and OAS, can swing your lifetime after-tax income by six figures. Research from Fidelity Canada has modeled scenarios where optimizing CPP timing alongside strategic RRSP-to-TFSA conversions adds $100,000 or more for a typical professional couple.
A passive portfolio is the engine. But the engine needs a chassis, steering, and someone who knows the road. For people with straightforward finances, a robo-advisor and a solid allocation ETF might be plenty. For professionals with practice income, corporate structures, debt strategies, or approaching retirement, the planning layer is where most of the value lives.
The Bottom Line
Passive index investing works because the math works. Low fees compound in your favor. Broad diversification reduces concentration risk. Staying invested through volatility has consistently beaten trying to time the market. Warren Buffett made a $1 million bet on that premise and won decisively: his S&P 500 index fund returned 125.8% over a decade while the hedge fund selection managed about 36%.
Build the portfolio on a passive foundation. Then figure out everything around it. That’s where the real planning happens.
If you need help securing your financial future, reach out to us. We have years of experience helping dozens of clients navigate the maze of financial instruments and strategy. Reach out to us today.
Want help building a low‑cost, diversified portfolio that fits into a smarter long‑term financial plan?
Start the Conversation